When payday is still far away, but you need money now. MoneyDay is an online microloan service where you can apply through the website or mobile app.
1.5M clients · 94% approval rate · 8.8 average rating
3 platforms160 screens, working with a PM and developers
02 · Scope of work
What came out of it
15competitors studied
5key decisions
160screens
03 · Context
A service where ten minutes decide everything
MoneyDay offers short-term loans with an application process that takes about 10 minutes. People want one thing: fast access to money without the hassle.
How I came in
I joined to finish a few screens. The scope grew into a full redesign across desktop, mobile web, and iOS/Android.
My role
Sole designer on the team. I handled research, UX/UI, prototypes, and design reviews. Delivered 160 screens across three platforms, mobile and desktop.
Here's what I designed, what changed, and what didn't go as planned.
04 · Problem
A simple task, a complicated product
People wanted quick access to money. The product got in the way with a long sign-up flow, a cluttered calculator, and an empty account.
BeforeAfter
BeforeAfter
Drag the slider. The old calculator on the left is cluttered, with the total hidden below. The new one shows the amount, interest rate, and repayment upfront, plus quick sign-in via Gosuslugi.
05 · Research
15 competitors, complete user flows
I studied 15 major competitors and went through their entire loan application flows, from the first screen to receiving the money. Three problems kept coming up.
From the first screen to receiving the money. Here are the issues I found across most competitors.
1
Long registration
Too many steps, fields, and explanations. Most competitors had the same problem, which made this an opportunity to stand out.
9of 10 require 4–5 sign-up steps
2
An overloaded calculator
Key numbers get buried in extra details. People want to know two things: how much they'll get and how much they'll repay.
11of 15 don't show key numbers upfront
3
Nothing to retain people with
After repaying a loan, there's no reason to return. No bonuses or referral program, either in our product or competitors'.
11of 15 offer no bonuses or referrals
06 · Strategy
Who the product is really for
Jobs to Be Done
“When I'm short on cash before payday and have no one to borrow from, I want to get a small loan quickly and sort things out today.”
1
We segment by behaviour
Everyone has the same ₽30,000 limit. What matters more is what happens after the loan, not its size. Users who repay with interest bring the most value to the business.
2
Why people come back
Users come from ads, referrals, and partners. They return mainly for the speed: a repeat loan takes about 15 minutes.
There was no dedicated retention feature, just push reminders.
One of my ad creatives. Same promise as the first screen: apply online, get your first loan for free, and receive the money by a set time.
07 · Hypothesis
What we bet on
Easier sign-up, clearer terms, more trust → more completed applications.
08 · Process
Prototypes over polished mockups
I built 2–3 interactive HTML prototypes for key screens to test the structure before finalizing the UI.
2–3 options → one meeting → one decision.
Five decisionsthat rewrote the path
1
Faster registration
Hints appear right when users need them. Nothing extra gets in the way of applying.
Just the numbers needed to decide: loan amount, interest rate, and total repayment. Everything else is gone.
Loan amountMoney by 22:45
15 000₽
4 000 ₽30 000 ₽
Get the money
Faster, without the form, via
ГосУслуги
Rate0 %*To repay15 000 ₽
By clicking the button, you agree to the Privacy Policy
Drag the slider to recalculate the amount
✓One slider instead of two✓The amount in large type✓When the money arrives✓Sign in with Gosuslugi✓Rate and repayment at onceCalculator on the first screen
3
More trust
Identity verification via Gosuslugi, with a clear benefit: a better chance of approval.
4
More reasons to come back
We added a referral program and asked for ratings right after sign-up, while the experience was still fresh.
Bonus points earned2,000 ₽Deducted from your next loan payment. Cannot be withdrawn to a card.2Repaid1In progress2Invited
Bonus points for invited friends
5
Simpler navigation
We removed the bottom navigation. The flow is linear: apply → borrow → repay. No need to switch between sections, and more room for content.
9:41
•Before: bottom menu✓Now: more fits on the screenPersonal account
10 · Design system
MoneyDay Design System 1.0
One library for the whole redesign: components, tokens and patterns, taken from the real interface.
Took me 7 minutes on my phone. Money came through SBP straight away.
Review card
Loan for pensioners0%
Amountup to 20,000 ₽
Term5 to 30 days
Learn more →
Loan product card
States1 component
Nothing found
Try another query, or pick a topic below.
Ask in chat
Empty state
Footer
PUTTING IT TOGETHERatoms → molecules → screen
How a screen is built from it10 steps
Loan amountMoney by 22:45
15 000 ₽
4 000 ₽30 000 ₽
Get the money
Faster, without the form, via
ГосУслуги
Rate0 %*To repay15 000 ₽
0 / 10
Colour and type sit in Atoms: in the original method those are atoms too, just abstract ones. Grid: 390 px with 16 px margins on mobile, 1512 with 156 on desktop. One effect style: a 32 px shadow, live on 105 instances.
What happenedafter launch
↑New users
Users sign up only once. Existing customers never saw the changes, while new users entered the new flow right away. There was no adjustment period: conversion jumped from 34% to 45% on day one.
Out of 100 people who start signing up, this many finish
before redesignafter launch
Registration conversion, % · the flow is walked once, so the effect shows from day one
↓Returning users
Returning users were a different story. They were used to the old interface and didn't recognize the new one. Activity dropped about 8% in the first month, then recovered by month three.
Previous levelAfter redesign
1Month 1. Activity dropped. Returning users struggled with the new icons and reordered menu.
2Month 2. We eased the transition by restoring familiar icons and menu order, plus a short hint on first sign-in.
3Month 3. Activity returned to its previous level.
Returning-user activity, indexed to the pre-launch level (100) · by month
12 · Key learnings
What this case taught me
The transition matters as much as the redesign
A redesign needs a smooth transition. Improving the UX is only part of the job. Returning users also need a way to adjust without losing what feels familiar.
Audit the flow, not the landing page
Going through 15 complete sign-up flows showed me what worked and what could be improved. Landing pages alone wouldn't reveal that.
A working prototype beats a polished mockup
Two or three clickable options with clear reasoning helped us make decisions faster than one polished screen.
13 · My role & team
Product designer
I was the sole designer on the team. The PM handled development and priorities. I owned design, from initial interviews to pre-release design reviews.